Skip to main content

ETF comparison

EWL vs FNDF

Both International Developed.

iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF · Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF

Holdings overlap

Weighted by ISIN/CUSIP
4.4 %

30 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of EWL and FNDF would leave roughly 4.4% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

EWL unmatched 94.4% Shared 4.4% FNDF unmatched 95.1%

Unmatched is the part of a fund's weight the other fund doesn't match: names only it holds, plus any extra weight it puts in names both funds hold.

In EWL only
10 positions
Shared
30 positions
In FNDF only
856 positions

Side by side

EWL

iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF

iShares · International Developed

58 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.50%
Net assets
$3.02B
TTM yield
1.66%
Top-10 conc.
65.4%
FNDF

Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF

Schwab · International Developed

84 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.25%
Net assets
$25.83B
TTM yield
3.05%
Top-10 conc.
15.0%

Sub-score comparison

50
Cost
75
80
Tax efficiency
77
77
Liquidity
100
21
Concentration
93
—
Tracking quality
—
EWL sub-score FNDF

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.

Cost difference

FNDF is 25 bps cheaper than EWL. On a $100,000 position that's about $250/yr more in fees for EWL.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with EWL vs FNDF.

Top shared holdings

30 shared in total
# Holding In EWL In FNDF Overlap
1 Roche Holding AG 13.64% 0.89% 0.89%
2 Nestle S.A. 11.05% 0.71% 0.71%
3 Novartis AG 12.34% 0.62% 0.62%
4 UBS Group AG 5.13% 0.31% 0.31%
5 Zurich Insurance Group AG 4.33% 0.29% 0.29%
6 COMPAGNIE FINANCIERE RICHEMONT SA 5.21% 0.21% 0.21%
7 ABB Ltd 5.75% 0.20% 0.20%
8 Swiss Re AG 2.78% 0.12% 0.12%
9 Holcim AG 2.44% 0.10% 0.10%
10 Sika AG 2.13% 0.08% 0.08%
11 Sandoz Group AG 1.99% 0.08% 0.08%
12 Kuehne + Nagel International AG 0.98% 0.08% 0.08%

Only in EWL

10 total
  • Galderma Group AG 2.18%
  • Helvetia Baloise Holding AG 1.39%
  • VAT Group AG 1.29%
  • Straumann Holding AG 0.94%
  • Swiss Prime Site AG 0.87%
  • Belimo Holding AG 0.83%
  • EMS-CHEMIE HOLDING AG 0.68%
  • Avolta AG 0.56%
  • Banque Cantonale Vaudoise 0.55%
  • BKW AG 0.39%

Only in FNDF

856 total
  • Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 3.73%
  • Shell PLC 2.40%
  • TotalEnergies SE 1.68%
  • BHP Group Ltd 1.23%
  • Glencore PLC 1.12%
  • HSBC Holdings PLC 1.11%
  • BP PLC 1.04%
  • Toyota Motor Corp 0.93%
  • Banco Santander SA 0.83%
  • Rio Tinto PLC 0.74%

Percentages are holdings overlap with the named fund.

Open EWL or FNDF at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.