ETF comparison
FMAT vs URNM
Both Materials.
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF · Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
Holdings overlap
1 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of FMAT and URNM would leave roughly 0.1% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.
Side by side
Sub-score comparison
Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.
Cost difference
FMAT is 67 bps cheaper than URNM. On a $100,000 position that's about $666/yr more in fees for URNM.
Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with FMAT vs URNM.
Top shared holdings
1 shared in total| # | Holding | In FMAT | In URNM | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State Street Global Advisors | 0.16% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
Only in FMAT
103 total- Linde PLC 14.99%
- Newmont Corp 7.77%
- Freeport-McMoRan Inc 5.32%
- CRH PLC 5.09%
- Sherwin-Williams Co/The 4.85%
- Air Products and Chemicals Inc 4.28%
- Ecolab Inc 4.26%
- Corteva Inc 3.51%
- Nucor Corp 3.30%
- Vulcan Materials Co 2.55%
Only in URNM
26 total- Cameco Corp 20.60%
- Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 13.55%
- Nexgen Energy Ltd 12.60%
- Uranium Energy Corp 4.91%
- Nac Kazatomprom Jsc 4.70%
- Denison Mines Corp 4.69%
- Energy Fuels Inc/canada 4.67%
- Paladin Energy Ltd 4.39%
- Cgn Mining Co Ltd 4.17%
- Yellow Cake Plc 4.01%
Open FMAT or URNM at a brokerage
Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.
Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.
Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions
matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see
/methodology/.
Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.