Skip to main content

ETF comparison

ITM vs PZA

Both US Municipal Bond.

VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF · Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF

Holdings overlap

Weighted by ISIN/CUSIP
1.5 %

104 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of ITM and PZA would leave roughly 1.5% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

ITM unmatched 96.7% Shared 1.5% PZA unmatched 97.3%

Unmatched is the part of a fund's weight the other fund doesn't match: names only it holds, plus any extra weight it puts in names both funds hold.

In ITM only
1,265 positions
Shared
104 positions
In PZA only
7,019 positions

Side by side

ITM

VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF

VanEck · US Municipal Bond

85 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.18%
Net assets
$2.33B
TTM yield
2.81%
Top-10 conc.
3.8%
PZA

Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF

Invesco · US Municipal Bond

83 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.28%
Net assets
$4.11B
TTM yield
3.95%
Top-10 conc.
1.0%

Sub-score comparison

82
Cost
72
93
Tax efficiency
93
72
Liquidity
83
100
Concentration
100
—
Tracking quality
—
ITM sub-score PZA

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.

Cost difference

ITM is 10 bps cheaper than PZA. On a $100,000 position that's about $100/yr more in fees for PZA.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with ITM vs PZA.

Top shared holdings

104 shared in total
# Holding In ITM In PZA Overlap
1 State of California 0.14% 0.06% 0.06%
2 State of California 0.08% 0.06% 0.06%
3 Central Plains Energy Project 0.07% 0.05% 0.05%
4 University of California 0.16% 0.05% 0.05%
5 New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority 0.10% 0.05% 0.05%
6 Metropolitan Transportation Authority 0.05% 0.04% 0.04%
7 Texas Water Development Board 0.04% 0.06% 0.04%
8 Energy Northwest 0.05% 0.04% 0.04%
9 State of Connecticut Special Tax Revenue 0.10% 0.04% 0.04%
10 New York City Transitional Finance Authority Future Tax Secured Revenue 0.05% 0.03% 0.03%
11 Hayward Unified School District 0.05% 0.03% 0.03%
12 Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp 0.03% 0.07% 0.03%

Only in ITM

1,265 total
  • New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority 0.53%
  • California Community Choice Financing Authority 0.50%
  • State of California 0.45%
  • California Community Choice Financing Authority 0.44%
  • Connecticut State Health & Educational Facilities Authority 0.39%
  • California Community Choice Financing Authority 0.37%
  • State of California 0.30%
  • Kentucky Public Energy Authority 0.29%
  • New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority 0.28%
  • California Housing Finance Agency 0.28%

Only in PZA

7,019 total
  • California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Kaiser Permanente) 0.13%
  • New York (State of) Dormitory Authority 0.11%
  • New York (State of) Dormitory Authority 0.10%
  • Jefferson (County of), AL 0.10%
  • California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center) 0.10%
  • Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District 0.10%
  • Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority 0.10%
  • Regents of the University of California Medical Center 0.10%
  • Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority (The) 0.09%
  • Ohio (State of) Higher Educational Facility Commission (Cleveland Clinic Health System Obligated Group) 0.09%

Percentages are holdings overlap with the named fund.

Open ITM or PZA at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.