Lazy portfolio

Golden Butterfly Portfolio

Tyler, Portfolio Charts (~2016)

A balanced-tilt extension of the Permanent Portfolio: 40% stocks (half total-market, half small-cap value), 40% Treasuries (half long-duration, half short-duration), 20% gold. Aims for similar drawdown protection while capturing more equity-side return.

Allocation

  • 20% · US Total Market
  • 20% · Small-cap value (tilt)
  • 20% · Long-term Treasuries
  • 20% · Short-term Treasuries
  • 20% · Gold

Weighted expense ratio

0.20%

Across the 5 of 5 slices we could price.

Weighted tax efficiency

71

/100, weighted by allocation. Lower in heavy-bond portfolios.

Slices

5

Number of holdings — also the number of lots you rebalance.

Implementation

Weight Role Ticker Score
20% US Total Market VTI 92
20% Small-cap value (tilt) AVUV 88
20% Long-term Treasuries TLT 78
20% Short-term Treasuries SHY 84
20% Gold GLD 73
  • AVUV · alternates: DFSV, IJS · Avantis US Small Cap Value — the factor-tilt workhorse for this slice. DFSV (Dimensional) and IJS (S&P 600 Value) are reasonable alternates with similar exposure.

Editorial take

A reasonable middle ground for investors who like the Permanent's logic but find pure equal-weight too conservative. The small-cap value tilt is doing real work here — replacing it with another total-market fund collapses the strategy back into something closer to a 40/40/20.

Try the Golden Butterfly Portfolio in our tools

Compare the slices

See holdings overlap and cost difference between any two of this portfolio's funds.

Open Golden Butterfly Portfolio holdings at a brokerage

All 5 slices in this portfolio trade commission-free at major brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.

Curated allocation. The funds listed are how this portfolio would be built using the catalog as it stands today; alternate tickers and notes are flagged inline.

PlainIndex publishes data and editorial commentary — nothing here is personalized investment advice. Read the methodology for how the scores referenced here are computed.