ETF comparison
COPX vs URNM
Both Materials.
Holdings overlap
0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of COPX and URNM would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.
Side by side
Sub-score comparison
Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.
Cost difference
COPX is 10 bps cheaper than URNM. On a $100,000 position that's about $100/yr more in fees for URNM.
Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with COPX vs URNM.
Top shared holdings
0 shared in totalNo shared holdings between these funds.
Only in COPX
39 total- Lundin Mining Corporation 6.06%
- GLENCORE PLC 5.99%
- Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. 5.97%
- KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA 5.81%
- FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. 5.04%
- Hudbay Minerals Inc. 4.94%
- BHP GROUP LIMITED 4.91%
- ANTOFAGASTA PLC 4.86%
- Teck Resources Limited 4.85%
- SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION 4.84%
Only in URNM
27 total- Cameco Corp 20.60%
- Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 13.55%
- Nexgen Energy Ltd 12.60%
- Uranium Energy Corp 4.91%
- Nac Kazatomprom Jsc 4.70%
- Denison Mines Corp 4.69%
- Energy Fuels Inc/canada 4.67%
- Paladin Energy Ltd 4.39%
- Cgn Mining Co Ltd 4.17%
- Yellow Cake Plc 4.01%
Open COPX or URNM at a brokerage
Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.
Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.
Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions
matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see
/methodology/.
Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.