Skip to main content

ETF comparison

ITM vs MUB

Both US Municipal Bond.

VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF · iShares National Muni Bond ETF

Holdings overlap

Weighted by ISIN/CUSIP
3.7 %

282 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of ITM and MUB would leave roughly 3.7% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

ITM unmatched 94.5% Shared 3.7% MUB unmatched 95.8%

Unmatched is the part of a fund's weight the other fund doesn't match: names only it holds, plus any extra weight it puts in names both funds hold.

In ITM only
1,087 positions
Shared
282 positions
In MUB only
6,770 positions

Side by side

ITM

VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF

VanEck · US Municipal Bond

85 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.18%
Net assets
$2.33B
TTM yield
2.81%
Top-10 conc.
3.8%
MUB

iShares National Muni Bond ETF

iShares · US Municipal Bond

97 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.050%
Net assets
$54.41B
TTM yield
3.00%
Top-10 conc.
1.4%

Sub-score comparison

82
Cost
95
93
Tax efficiency
93
72
Liquidity
100
100
Concentration
100
—
Tracking quality
—
ITM sub-score MUB

Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.

Cost difference

MUB is 13 bps cheaper than ITM. On a $100,000 position that's about $130/yr more in fees for ITM.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with ITM vs MUB.

Top shared holdings

282 shared in total
# Holding In ITM In MUB Overlap
1 State of California 0.10% 0.10% 0.10%
2 Connecticut State Health & Educational Facilities Authority 0.39% 0.07% 0.07%
3 State of Minnesota 0.10% 0.06% 0.06%
4 District of Columbia 0.05% 0.10% 0.05%
5 University of California 0.05% 0.09% 0.05%
6 Private Colleges & Universities Authority 0.05% 0.05% 0.05%
7 City of Houston TX Combined Utility System Revenue 0.05% 0.05% 0.05%
8 New York State Dormitory Authority 0.05% 0.05% 0.05%
9 State of California 0.10% 0.05% 0.05%
10 State of California 0.10% 0.04% 0.04%
11 University of California 0.04% 0.05% 0.04%
12 New York City Transitional Finance Authority Future Tax Secured Revenue 0.15% 0.04% 0.04%

Only in ITM

1,087 total
  • California Community Choice Financing Authority 0.50%
  • California Community Choice Financing Authority 0.44%
  • California Community Choice Financing Authority 0.37%
  • Kentucky Public Energy Authority 0.29%
  • California Housing Finance Agency 0.28%
  • Southeast Energy Authority A Cooperative District 0.27%
  • New Hampshire Business Finance Authority 0.27%
  • Salem-Keizer School District No 24J 0.26%
  • South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority 0.26%
  • Massachusetts Development Finance Agency 0.26%

Only in MUB

6,770 total
  • Board of Regents of the University of Texas System 0.18%
  • San Antonio Water System 0.15%
  • New York State Thruway Authority 0.15%
  • New York State Dormitory Authority 0.13%
  • Northwest Independent School District 0.12%
  • Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.12%
  • State of New Jersey 0.12%
  • Ohio State University (The) 0.12%
  • State of Washington 0.12%
  • State of California 0.12%

Percentages are holdings overlap with the named fund.

Open ITM or MUB at a brokerage

Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.